DevOps as we know it is dead. Possibly not many people agree with me, but the age of DevOps is just about ended. Then again, perhaps this won’t come as a revelation to some. While convinced industries somehow manage to survive for year’s decades, maybe without needing to make fundamental changes, that’s categorically not the case in the software world. Developers reliably reinvent the turn, in our tools and perform. It just keeps getting better and better by structure on present technologies and continually making developments.
It’s a perfect storm scenario in some ways; lots of events have come together to drastically change the status quo. Where it all began was the thought and eventual widespread adoption of agile development and Continuous Deployment practices. DevOps was invented as a way to unite developers and IT operations (system administrators) to help them find shared ground. The principle was to automate the development and deployment tools that need collaborations between both corrections. However, someone still has to come in and write the compulsory toolset. Thus, most companies resolved to create DevOps teams that mutual the expertise of both sides to provision their developers.
The old model of heaving the code over the partition to system administrators who would deploy it stationary working with agile processes and continuous deployment practices. Whose responsibility is it when something goes wrong — the person who’s deploying the code or the developers? Developers don’t know much about organizing and systems administrators don’t know much about how the code is invented to work. Thus, we professed “all deployments will be automated” and DevOps teams were born not without rather a bit of confusion in the market over the explanation itself of DevOps. The fat lady chanted and system administrators were pronounced DevOps, and they started to study Python to develop tools. Developers who knew a thing or two about operating systems and networking combined in to help them with development.
Suggested Read: How to become a successful DevOps engineer
For a time, all was good and peachy. DevOps teams were favorably developing their custom tools, permitting developers to deploy the code to production with an impulse of a button; though, they were still handling a lot of infrastructures the same way that system administrators were doing it before — databases had to be skillfully installed, replicated, clustered, cached, etc. DevOps has themselves become a needless step in the Continuous Deployment Procedure. But before long, another problem crept in.
No one wanted to invest a lot of money into DevOps; they didn’t write the product’s; attractive features and they are, honestly, the cost center of your company now. The teams were bare bones; they did the minimum work necessary, but it was tough to get the tools to the point of great reusability and give developers enough control to configure the tools themselves. Suddenly, DevOps became the bottleneck. All wasn’t quite so peachy and rainbow anymore
In other words, accomplished services detached a lot of annoyances with which DevOps teams were forced to transaction. Does DevOps need to go away entirely? No! In fact, it will live on in current development teams. DevOps at its essential should really be a culture, and the very significant skills it cultivated over the years should be informed to all developers, particularly those of the next generation. The DevOps role itself will live on in an, unlike the state, though — largely to manage governance matters like integrated security and cost management, because while the cloud delivers flexibility for instantly provisioning new software and tools on request, the flip side is that you have to be alert with it. Then, you can unintentionally provision more than you essential and you’ll end up spending prosperity. DevOps as a team may be gone sooner than later, but its practices will be accepted on to whole development teams so that we can continue to build upon what it has brought us in the past years.